A judge has expressed skepticism towards a man’s claims of remorse in light of his sexual crimes.
During the sentencing hearing at the Brantford Superior Court, Justice Gail Sinclair questioned the sincerity of the accused’s remorse, stating that it seemed “convenient” and “self-serving.”
The man, who cannot be named due to a publication ban, pleaded guilty to multiple charges of sexual assault and sexual interference involving two young girls. The incidents occurred between 2016 and 2018, when the victims were between the ages of 10 and 12.
According to the Crown attorney, the accused had a “pattern of grooming” the victims, gaining their trust and then sexually assaulting them. The prosecutor also noted that the accused had a previous conviction for sexual assault in 2005.
In his statement to the court, the accused expressed remorse for his actions and apologized to the victims and their families. He also claimed that he was seeking help and was committed to changing his behavior.
However, Justice Sinclair was not convinced, stating that the accused’s actions showed a “complete lack of empathy” towards the victims. She also noted that the accused had not taken any steps towards rehabilitation since his previous conviction.
The judge also expressed concern about the impact of the accused’s actions on the victims, stating that they will have to live with the trauma for the rest of their lives.
The Crown is seeking a sentence of 10 to 12 years in prison, while the defense is asking for a sentence of five to six years.
The sentencing hearing will continue on a later date, with the judge expected to deliver her decision in the coming weeks.
