The Supreme Court of Canada has declined to hear the appeal of a former Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) analyst who claimed she faced discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
The case involves a woman, identified only as “Jane Doe,” who worked for CSIS from 2004 to 2009. She alleged that she was subjected to sexist and racist comments, as well as being denied promotions and training opportunities because of her gender and race.
In 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed her case, stating that she had not provided enough evidence to prove discrimination. The court also ruled that CSIS had taken appropriate measures to address her complaints.
Doe then appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Federal Court of Appeal had set the bar too high for proving discrimination and that CSIS had not adequately addressed her complaints.
However, on Thursday, the Supreme Court announced that it would not hear her appeal, effectively upholding the Federal Court of Appeal’s decision.
In a statement, CSIS said it was pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision and that it remains committed to providing a respectful and inclusive workplace for all employees.
Doe’s lawyer, Paul Champ, expressed disappointment with the decision, stating that it sends a message that it is difficult for employees to hold government agencies accountable for discrimination.
This case highlights the ongoing issue of discrimination and harassment in the workplace, particularly in male-dominated fields such as national security. It also raises questions about the effectiveness of measures put in place by employers to address these issues.
While the Supreme Court’s decision may be seen as a setback for Doe, it serves as a reminder for employers to take proactive steps to prevent discrimination and harassment in the workplace.
