A beloved pet dog named Peanut must be returned to its original owner after a couple’s breakup, according to a ruling by the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal.
The dispute began when the couple, who were in a common-law relationship, decided to end their relationship. The woman, who had originally purchased Peanut, wanted to keep the dog while the man argued that he had been the primary caregiver and should have custody.
After hearing both sides, the tribunal ruled in favor of the woman, stating that she was the legal owner of Peanut and had the right to decide where the dog should live.
In their decision, the tribunal noted that the woman had purchased Peanut before the couple began living together and had paid for all of the dog’s expenses. They also found that the man’s claims of being the primary caregiver were not supported by evidence.
The tribunal also considered the emotional attachment between the dog and its owner, stating that “pets are not just property, but are living creatures with feelings and emotions.”
The ruling has sparked a conversation about the legal rights of pet owners in common-law relationships. While married couples have clear laws regarding pet custody in the event of a divorce, the same is not true for common-law relationships.
According to the BC SPCA, pets are considered property under the law and are typically awarded to the person who purchased them. However, they also recommend that couples create a written agreement outlining who will have custody of the pet in the event of a breakup.
In this case, the tribunal’s decision has set a precedent for future disputes over pet custody in common-law relationships. It serves as a reminder for pet owners to consider their legal rights and responsibilities when it comes to their furry companions.
As for Peanut, the dog will be returned to its original owner, where it will continue to receive love and care.
